The Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) has once again failed to pass a rebuilding plan for yellowfin tuna. This is despite a growing call from the seafood supply chain to act.
The Global Tuna Alliance has expressed its’ dismay at the outcome of the most recent 27th Session of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission meeting, which took place in Mauritius in the second week of May.
The meeting was another opportunity for the inter-governmental regulatory body to pass a rebuilding plan for yellowfin tuna, which has been overfished in the Indian Ocean since 2015.
Market dissatisfaction
The Global Tuna Alliance represents some of the world’s largest seafood suppliers and retailers. This year it ramped up its advocacy campaign significantly. This included collaborating with the Tuna Protection Alliance (TUPA), WWF and their respective market partners to produce a range of statements and a report highlighting the deficiencies within the IOTC’s Objections Process. (see below)
Hitting out at the Regional Fisheries Management Organisation’s (RFMO) “broken” decision-making process, which allows objections by member states to block proposals, even if there is a clear consensus in favour, the Global Tuna Alliance warns that continued failure to act could result in the market walking away en masse from the Indian Ocean.
It cites its joint campaign with the Tuna Protection Alliance (TUPA) and WWF and their market partners as evidence of growing discontent.
Objections to cuts
To refresh readers memories, there have been repeated failures in recent years to address the overfishing of yellowfin tuna in the Indian Ocean.
In 2021 the IOTC’s Scientific Committee said catches should be cut by 30% of 2020 levels. This would enable the stock to recover by 2030.
That same year, an interim plan – which would have seen a very modest cut to yellowfin catches as a stop gap for a single year – failed to pass owing to objections from six countries, despite 18 being in favour of the plan. The six countries are India, Indonesia, Oman, Iran, Madagascar and Comoros.
Unsustainable product
At last year’s meeting, there was a similar attempt to agree a rebuilding plan for yellowfin. According to the Global Tuna Alliance, this was stymied by objections “without rationale or alternative.”
Ahead of this year’s meeting, the Global Tuna Alliance stepped up its advocacy efforts. It kicked off its campaign launching its own fake can of “Overfished Indian Ocean Yellowfin Tuna” at Seafood Expo North America. This was to highlight the predicament its partners face in trying to market an unsustainable product to an increasingly environmentally conscious consumer base.
Already one of the largest seafood supply chain networks in the world – with 32% of tuna passing through its partners in 2021, worth a dock price of USD2.3bn – the chorus of voices from the market demanding sustainable tuna became noticeably louder and more unified.
Revision of objections process
As part of their joint campaign, the three organisations released a joint statement demanding a plan that would restore the yellowfin tuna stock in two generations. This called for a revision to the IOTC’s objections process in the hope that it would break the deadlock over yellowfin.
A report co-authored by the organisations documented what they believed to be a catalogue of misuses of the objections process by IOTC delegates. It highlighted the fact that no other tuna RFMO has an objections process that allows members to opt out of measures they don’t want to comply with.
Market partners speak out
Most strikingly, the campaign included a series of 20 individual statements from the market partners of the GTA, TUPA and WWF. All outlined the steps they either have taken, or will potentially take, to move their sourcing away from the Indian Ocean over the continued overfishing of yellowfin.
In their statement, GTA and TUPA Partner, Princes Group says: “Given the continued overfishing of Indian Ocean yellowfin tuna since 2015, Princes calls on the IOTC to take urgent action to bring catches down across the fishery in line with the scientific advice. The market has continued to make its voice clear. Princes has voluntarily reduced its use of Indian Ocean yellowfin by more than 50% since 2017…
“The current status quo of infighting and disagreement needs to end and responsibility must be taken. Compromise is necessary in the interests of Indian Ocean countries, economies and for the IOTCs future as a credible and functioning management organisation.”
Voluntary measure
Despite these efforts and several proposals for a rebuilding plan on the table at this year’s IOTC meeting, only one passed from host country Mauritius. But it was subject to revisions that made it a voluntary measure.
Reacting to the outcome of the meeting, the GTA’s new Executive Director, Daniel Suddaby, said:
“I witnessed first-hand the urgency for a cut in yellowfin tuna catch at the IOTC meeting in 2016… It is disheartening to see that no substantial progress has been made. The passing of a watered-down rebuilding plan, which can be easily opted out of within a flawed objections system, highlights a profound irony.
“Without fixing the broken objections system, member states have no incentive to compromise. It allows them to hold the IOTC hostage and prioritise their national interest over the long-term wellbeing of the fishery which supports thousands of livelihoods and millions of people’s food security.
“What has changed since 2016 is that the market grows more organised with a unified voice and a willingness to wield its commercial influence by sourcing tuna elsewhere. The catching and processing countries blocking a rebuilding plan will inevitably suffer the consequences. Their national interests will be impacted, jeopardising their economic future in the face of a changing market landscape.”
Positive steps
Suddaby notes the positive steps taken by the Commission in line with the GTA’s pre-meeting asks:
“The GTA commends the dedication and support shown by countries and delegates who submitted and backed proposals, especially those advocating for a comprehensive rebuilding plan for yellowfin tuna.
“We are thrilled to witness the adoption of measures to establish catch limits for bigeye tuna, aligning with the total allowable catch (TAC) determined by the Scientific Committee.
“Furthermore, we are pleased with the approval of electronic monitoring minimum standards. This significant development holds the potential to address the issue of insufficient observer coverage in the region. It instills greater confidence among our partners in the IOTC’s commitment to enhancing the transparency of tuna fishing practices.”
Read this previous aticle on the Agreement on Indian Ocean Tuna Stocks
